shocked? nope, me neither!
| You are a Social Liberal (61% permissive) and an... Economic Liberal (26% permissive) You are best described as a:
Link: The Politics Test on OkCupid Free Online Dating Also: The OkCupid Dating Persona Test |
posted by Meegs | 4:57 PM
5 Comments:
Who knew I am more of a lefty than the D-ski ... here are my results:
Social Liberal
(90% permissive)
and an...
Economic Liberal
(10% permissive)
You are best described as a:
Socialist
I am sitting on Ghandi's shoulder :-)
You are a
Social Liberal
(60% permissive)
and an...
Economic Moderate
(41% permissive)
You are best described as a:
Centrist
You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. loc: (37, -32)
modscore: (25, 36)
raw: (2833)
I AM SUPPRISED BY MAGGIE'S RESULTS, BUT MINE LOOK ABOUT RIGHT
I come out socialist, too, almost exactly the same numbers as Drew.
Well aint that a twisty turn of events!!!!
Your true political self:
You are a
Social Conservative
(30% permissive)
and an...
Economic Moderate
(50% permissive)
You are best described as a:
Fascist
You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness. loc: (-75, 0)
modscore: (30, 18)
raw: (3022)
Explanation Of Results
We wanted to get beyond the two catch-alls of American politics, the Democratic and Republican parties, and see where people actually stand. Parties can bring together people with marginally differing values and make collective action easier. But party platforms can misrepresent their constituents, and blind loyalty to a party can convince individuals to harbor inconsistent views.
The goal of this test was to exactly classify your personal politics, without the traditional labels. We avoided the edgy party issues and focused on fundamental values. Your score is a measure of what you believe in, economically and socially.
Higher permissiveness, on either axis, indicates a "live and let live" philosophy. Of course, we're almost conditioned in America, "Land of the Free", to think positively of such a philosophy. But practically speaking, permissiviness (or its opposite, regulation) can create any number of outcomes:
For example, on the economic axis, a highly permissive system, like the American system of the early 1900s, might mean things like low taxes and increased scientific innovation. It might also result, as it did back then, in unrestricted child labor and millions of poor people with black lung.
At the other end of the economic spectrum, a highly regulated system might conserve the environment, establish national health care, and eliminate poverty. But as we've learned from the Soviet system, extreme regulation can also lead to stagnation, sameness, and unhappiness.
If you liked the test, forward it. Thanks for participating.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home